Research
EKOS acknowledges or supports the following
research studies which incorporate ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis as a
treatment modality. Studies marked as off label (OL) are intended to provide
data in support of potential future clinical applications and
regulatory
submissions.
The ATTRACT Trial (DVT)
Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with
Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis. Designed to determine if the
initial use of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (PCDT) in
symptomatic patients with acute upper leg deep vein thrombosis (DVT) reduces
the occurrence of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS)
over a 24-month follow-up period. Principal Investigator of this NIH-funded, Phase III,
multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical study is Dr.Suresh Vedantham,
from Washington University in St. Louis, MO. This is an NIH-funded,
Phase III, multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients in
the experimental arm will be treated with PCDT and intrathrombus delivery of
rt-PA for a period of up to 24 hours followed by standard anti-coagulant DVT
therapy. Patients in the control arm will receive only standard
anti-coagulant DVT therapy. The study is in the process of initiation at
30-50 centers with the goal of recruiting 692 patients. The protocol is
designed to maximize the probability of removing > 90% of the venous clot in
the experimental arm patients through the use of PCDT devices and/or
standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Investigators are allowed to
use EKOS ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis as an alternative to standard
CDT.
Click
here to learn more about the ATTRACT Trial
The CAVA Trial (CAtheter
Versus Anticoagulation)
A
randomized controlled Dutch multicenter trial
comparing ultrasound-accelerated
catheter-directed thrombolysis and standard
anticoagulant therapy, with standard
anticoagulant therapy alone, in acute primary
iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.
Objectives
To assess whether ultrasound-accelerated CDT
combined with standard anticoagulant therapy in
acute primary IFDVT can significantly reduce the
postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) incidence after 1
year compared with standard anticoagulant
therapy alone. The secondary objective is to
investigate the effects on clot lysis, patency
of the affected vein, valve function, recurrent
thrombosis rate, HR-QOL and medical costs.
The
DUET Trial
Dutch
randomized trial comparing standard
catheter-directed thrombolysis versus
ultrasound-accelerated
thrombolysis
for thrombo-emoblic infra-inguinal disease (DUET).In
the DUET Trial, a total of 60 adult patients
with recently (between 1 and 7 weeks) thrombosed
infra-inguinal native arteries or bypass grafts
with acute limb ischemia class I and IIa,
(according to the Rutherford classification for
acute ischemia), will be randomly allocated to
either group A (standard thrombolysis) or group
B (EKOS ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis).
The trial is designed to compare ultrasound (US)
accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis to
standard catheter directed thrombolysis in
patients with recently thrombosed infra-inguinal
native arteries or bypass grafts.
Drs. Jean-Paul
de Vries and A.M. Schrijver (St. Antonius Hospital,
Nieuwegein, NL) and Dr. Michel M.P.J. Reijnen (Rijnstate
Hospital, Arnhem, NL)are the Principle
Investigators. Additional study sites in the
Netherlands are being added
The ULTIMA Trial (OL)
ULTrasound
Accelerated ThrombolysIs
of PulMonAry
Embolism (ULTIMA).
In the ULTIMA Trial, 50 patients with pulmonary
embolism and enlarged right hearts (RV/LV ratio
≥ 1) will be randomized to receive either
standard of care anti-coagulation or Actilyse (Boehringer
Ingelheim) delivered via the EKOS EkoSonic
Endovascular Device. The trial is designed to
confirm that ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis
will produce significant reduction in right
heart size at 24 hours, compared to
anti-coagulant alone, without increased bleeding
or other adverse events.
Dr. Nils Kucher at the University Hospital in Bern
Switzerland is the Principle Investigator for the
study. Additional study sites are the University
Hospitals in Dresden, Munich, Leipzig and Greifswald
Germany.
The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS III) Trial (OL)
The purpose of the IMS III Trial is to compare the safety and efficacy
of two different treatment approaches: 1) combined intravenous (IV) and
intra-arterial (IA) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA); and 2)
standard (IV) rt-PA alone; to restoring blood flow in the brain following
acute occlusion of a treatable cerebral artery (ischemic stroke). Treatment
must be initiated within three hours of acute ischemic stroke onset.
Principal Investigators of this NIH (NINDS) funded randomized, multi-center,
controlled study are Drs. Thomas Tomsick and Joseph Broderick of the
University of Cincinnati. This is an NIH (NINDS) – funded randomized,
multi-center, controlled study. Target enrollment is 900 patients. When
patients are randomized to the experimental (IV-IA) arm and are candidates
for IA therapy, the investigator can chose among several techniques
including IA infusion of rt-PA using the MicroSonic
SV Endovascular Device.
Background of the IMS studies The Interventional Management of Stroke III
study is based largely on two preceeding studies
called IMS I [ref Broderick] and IMS II [ref
Broderick & Tomsick] which evaluated the safety
of delivering IA rt-PA in acute ischemic stroke
patients. IMS I used exclusively a standard
microcatheter for IA delivery. IMS II used the
EKOS Microsonic SV Endovascular Device
whenever possible; otherwise a standard microcatheter
was used. The EkoSonic
SV Endovascular System was used in 41% of the
patients in the 73 patient trial to deliver the thombolytic drugs directly to the clot.
Click
here to learn more about the IMS III Trial
Please note the Intended Use Statements regarding the EkoSonic SV™ Endovascular System
Peripheral
Vasculature: The EkoSonic SV Endovascular
System is intended for the controlled and
selective infusion of physician-specified
fluids, including thrombolytics, into the
peripheral vasculature.
Neuro
Vasculature: The EkoSonic SV Endovascular
System is intended for regional infusion of
contrast materials into selected vessels in the neurovasculature. The EkoSonic SV Endovascular
System may be used for controlled, regional
infusion into
selected vessels.
|
The
safety and effectiveness of the EkoSonic
SV Endovascular System for thrombolytic
therapy in the neurovasculature have not
been established. Further clinical
studies are necessary to ensure that use
of devices to deliver thrombolytic
therapy into the neurovasculature does
not result in an increased incidence of
adverse events (e.g., intracranial
hemorrhage). |
Coronary
Vasculature: The EkoSonic SV Endovascular
System is intended to deliver physician
specified fluids to the coronary vasculature.
|
The safety and effectiveness of the EkoSonic
SV Endovascular System used for intracoronary thrombolytic therapy
administration have not been established. In particular, the ultrasound
energy delivered by the EkoSonic SV™ Endovascular System is not intended to
be therapeutic, and the safety and effectiveness of the EKOS system for
coronary thrombolysis or thrombectomy (i.e. clot disruption) have not been
established. |
«
Back
»
|